Document Review – Page 5

Production of Metadata and the Importance of the Meet & Confer Process

February 21, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Form of Production, Metadata, Motion to Compel, Native File, Request for Production, Uncategorized

This lawsuit demonstrates why it is so important that parties frilly discuss their ESI early in the evolution of a case. Had that been done, the Defendants might not have opposed the Plaintiffs’ requests for certain metadata. Moreover, the parties might have been able to work out many, if not[…]

Production of Text Messages Protocol

February 17, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, Form of Production, Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Text Messages, Uncategorized

The sensitivity courts are showing to text messages and public employees’ reasonable expectation of privacy has been very impressive. This sensitivity is evident in cases such as Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc., which found that a police officer had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his messages, due[…]

Ethics of e-Discovery (or, Teaching Lawyers Ballet)

February 11, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, ethics, Form of Production

“Watching an incompetent lawyer is like watching a clumsy ballerina.” Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola, February 4, 2009 Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola’s keynote at Legal Tech 2009 had a call to action for lawyers to have certifications and standards of competence regarding technology. In light of how everyday life[…]

Discovery Production Workflow: Lessons from Magistrate Judges Facciola & Grimm

February 2, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Motion to Compel, Processing, Request for Production

In my prior posting Playing with Fire: Producing ESI as Paper we looked at the dangers of producing ESI as paper. In addition to the legal analysis, Judge Facciola outlined a workflow for the parties in Covad Communications Company v. Revonet, Inc. The Defendants represented to the Court that it[…]

Playing with Fire: Producing ESI as Paper

January 30, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Form of Production, Motion to Compel, Request for Production

“…Revonet’s producing the e-mails only in hard copy played with fire. ” Magistrate Judge John Facciola, Covad Communications Company v. Revonet, Inc. I have blogged on parties failing to state a form of production in prior postings and producing parties attempting to produce ESI as paper or non-searchable TIFFs. In[…]

Back on the Record: Tips on Deposition Preparation with Technology

January 21, 2009 Josh Gilliland CT Summation, Deposition, Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery

I have taken and defended a good number of depositions. Preparing for deposition requires thoroughness, thoughtfulness, and not being tied to your question outline like a student actor reading a script. Whether you are “old school” or “new school,” there are many ways to enhance your deposition practice with litigation[…]

Deposition Review with CT Summation iBlaze Color Highlighting

January 9, 2009 Josh Gilliland CT Summation, Deposition, Document Review, e-Discovery

You can open my old Civil Procedure course book and see I usually highlighted cases with three colors: Blue for the “Issue,” orange for “Rule,” yellow for “Analysis” and a note in the margin for the “Conclusion” (IRAC for the non-lawyers). Law students have been highlighting and writing in textbooks[…]

What Happens When the Requesting Party Does Not State a Form of Production?

January 8, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, Duty of Care, Form of Production, Motion to Compel, Request for Production

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 34 allows for a requesting party to state the form of production in their request. In the event a requesting party does not state the form of production, the responding party can state the form of production in their reply. However, if no party[…]

e-Discovery: Not like Reviewing a Box of Paper

January 7, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Request for Production

Treating e-Discovery review the same as a paper-based document review runs the risk of shattering the litigation process. In Oracle v. SAP, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88319, the estimated cost of reviewing 165 custodians was projected as $16.5 million. This included the defendants employing more than fifty contract attorneys and[…]

The e-Discovery Chase: Strategies to Reduce Electronically Stored Information in Discovery Requests

December 30, 2008 Josh Gilliland Culling, Document Review, e-Discovery, Processing

All of our tools and toys that generate electronically stored information can frustrate law firms with high e-Discovery costs. Lawyers who choose to have their discovery productions printed can have nearly 10,000 times more paper than 10 years ago.[1] It is difficult to visualize how “big” ESI can be. WIRED[…]