Request for Production – Page 8

Boarding a Flight with Foreign Based Discovery for the Holidays

November 25, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, Foreign Discovery

In the spirit of holiday travel, the Plaintiffs in Park v. Korean Air Lines Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107647 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2009) brought a motion to compel discovery regarding tickets purchased in South Korea to show price fixing. As quickly as you can say “What’s your clearance,[…]

Speedy Delivery: Compelling Imaging & Searching of Everything

October 15, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Imaging Hard Drives, Request for Production, Search Terms

In a contract dispute regarding a shipping vendor, the Plaintiff brought a motion to compel the collection and processing of the entire contents of Defendants’ hard drives, network drives, and user files. Unishippers Global Logistics, LLC v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94844 (D. Utah Oct. 12,[…]

A Picture is worth a Thousand Words, but Sanctions are Priceless

September 21, 2009 Josh Gilliland Duty to Preserve, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Litigation Hold

The Defendants in Green v. McClendon, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71860 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2009) attempted to purchase a $4.2 million painting. As the Defendants’ marriage ended in divorce, the Defendants (who never took physical ownership) did not complete their payments. The Plaintiff sought sanctions against both the Defendant and[…]

Production Madness: The Covad Story Continues with New ESI Pitfalls

August 31, 2009 Josh Gilliland e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Form of Production, Imaging Hard Drives

Understandably, taking an electronic document such as a spreadsheet, printing it, cutting it up, and telling one’s opponent to paste it back together again, when the electronic document can be produced with a keystroke is madness in the world in which we live. Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola, Covad Communs.[…]

Get Out the Check Book for Translating ESI into a Reasonably Usable Form in California

August 21, 2009 Josh Gilliland California Electronic Discovery Act, Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Form of Production, Reasonably Accessible, Reasonably Useable Form

California Code of Civil Procedure 2031.280(e) states, in relevant part: If necessary, the responding party at the reasonable expense of the demanding party shall, through detection devices, translate any data compilations included in the demand into reasonably usable form. California Code of Civil Procedure 2031.280(e) might give anyone used to[…]

Don’t Argue Imaginary ESI Production Problems

August 19, 2009 Josh Gilliland Document Review, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, ethics, Form of Production, Metadata, Motion to Compel, Native File, OCR, TIFF

In re NetBank, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69031 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 7, 2009) has form of production arguments that illustrate the need to understand the processing abilities of electronically stored information applications and review in litigation support software. The Request for Production In this class certification case, the Plaintiff[…]

Rock Opera Discovery of Archived ESI

August 17, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Form of Production, Meet & Confer, Reasonably Accessible, Request for Production

In re In re Operadora DB Mex., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68078 (M.D. Fla. May 28, 2009), is the story of an international legal dispute, arbitration and the Hard Rock Café. While all of that makes for an exciting feature act, we will rock out to the electronic discovery issues. The[…]

Turning Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures into Rule 26(e) Supplemental Disclosures

July 31, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Initial Disclosures, Request for Production, Supplemental Disclosures

What happens if more responsive documents are found after the case management order setting a required disclosure deadline? Answer: You must supplement your disclosure. In Kutrip v. City of St. Louis, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60199 (E.D. Mo. June 30, 2009), the deadline for discovery was November 30, 2006 and[…]

Telling the Judge ESI is “Expensive” is not an Excuse for Failing to Produce

July 20, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Request for Production

It is generally a bad sign when an opinion begins with a Court banning parties from filing more discovery motions without the Court’s approval. This is one of those cases. Textron Fin. Corp. v. Eddy’s Trailer Sales, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60065 (E.D.N.Y. July 10, 2009). One of the[…]

Spoliation is a “Grimm” Business

July 16, 2009 Josh Gilliland Litigation Hold, Search Terms, Spoliation

Magistrate Judge Grimm is no stranger to watershed opinions…and on occasion the 100 page a law review article disguised as an opinion on the admissibility of electronically stored information. Goodman v. Praxair Servs., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58263 (D. Md. July 7, 2009) is Judge Grimm’s recent opinion on litigation holds,[…]