Knotty Issues of eDiscovery
In an age discrimination suit, a Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery was denied by a Magistrate Judge on the grounds the requests were overboard. The Plaintiff challenged Magistrate’s order. The District Court found the requests were also overboard. Doubt v. NCR Corp., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95518, 11-12 (N.D. Cal.[…]
Read more
A Defendant refused to produce ESI claiming the estimated $2,630.00 to search the data was unduly burdensome under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rules 26(b)(2)(C)(iii) and 26(b)(2)(B). Hudson v. AIH Receivable Mgmt. Servs., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39993 (D. Kan. Apr. 13, 2011). The Defendant was a company of 13[…]
Read moreA Plaintiff sought the forensic image of a laptop after the producing party collected the responsive data and placed it on a thumb drive. Magistrate Judge Nuffer denied the motion. Hansen v. Chevron USA, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58488 (D. Utah May 31, 2011). In the course of discovery,[…]
Read moreIn a business dispute, the Plaintiffs sought the production of email messages in native file format with metadata. The successor counsel to the Defendant claimed producing as TIFF’s would be sufficient, because the ESI was “no longer available in native format.” Moreover, the Defendant claimed producing metadata was “unnecessary and[…]
Read moreIn an employment discrimination case, the Defendant claimed the Plaintiff intentionally destroyed data off her personal computer and audio tapes. The Defendant sought the dismissal of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit and claimed they had spent $150,000 because of the alleged discovery violations. Coburn v. PN II, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110613[…]
Read moreThe Plaintiffs in 1524948 Alberta Ltd. v. John Doe 1-50 claimed they were the victims of trademark infringement, trade libel, defamation and intentional interference with contractual relationships. The Plaintiffs claimed the unknown Defendants used a website “to publish allegedly “false, defamatory and infringing statements and to conduct other unlawful activity[…]
Read moreThe Plaintiff in a sexual harassment case was able to demonstrate a prima facie case to overturn a summary judgment on the narrow issue whether she was retaliated against for filing her lawsuit. Magiera v. City of Dallas, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16802 (5th Cir. Tex. Aug. 11, 2010). The[…]
Read moreThe ridiculously high number of irrelevant materials and the large volume of privileged communications produced demonstrate a lack of reasonableness. Robert C. Chambers, United States District Court Judge Preparing electronic discovery takes careful review and following Judge Grimm’s Victor Stanley checklist. That did not happen in this case. The Plaintiffs[…]
Read moreYou should never betray the family…and one such betrayal resulted in trademark litigation over Mafia Wars. Now You are Part of the Family For those not familiar with Mafia Wars (or you spend a lot of time clicking “Ignore”), it is a game on social networking sites such as Facebook. […]
Read moreLegend says in 2005, litigation began over cell phone towers and “monopoles.” Discovery was extensive. Summary judgment motions were lost and won. Time had past. And then, what was lost was then found. When You Find the Ark of the e-Discovery Covenant A custodian’s computer was found in September 2008[…]
Read more