Request for Production – Page 9

Request for Production: Any and All Documents in the Past 46 Years Supporting the Overthrow of a Communist Government

June 22, 2009 Josh Gilliland Criminal Procedure, Discovery, Neutrality Act, Request for Production

Sometimes there is a case that is just too unique to pass up. This is one of those cases. The Defendants in a criminal case were charged in a conspiracy to ship weapons to Laos to overthrow the Communist Government. United States v. Jack, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43120, 2-3[…]

Motion to Compel Camera Phone Photo

June 19, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Form of Production, Request for Production

Just as the Def Leppard Song Goes: All I got is a photograph — and it is not enough. (from the classic Photograph) The Defendants requested a photo from a Plaintiff that was taken on his cell phone. The Plaintiffs in turn produced the photo. There was one little problem[…]

The Return of Covad Communications: Forensic Imaging of Databases & Email Servers

June 17, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Imaging Hard Drives, Request for Production, Search Terms

Magistrate Judge Facciola’s “Christmas Eve” opinion now has a sequel: Covad Communs. Co. v. Revonet, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47841 (D.D.C. May 27, 2009). This opinion is very detailed covering issues of forensic examinations, email servers and commentary on retention policies. I encourage lawyers to look at this opinion. […]

The Plumbing of a Motion to Compel

June 15, 2009 Josh Gilliland Culling, Deposition, Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Litigation Hold, Motion to Compel, Processing, Request for Production

In a product defect case about brass plumbing fittings, the Defendants fought a motion to compel electronically stored information relevant to class certification, because of undue burden and cost. They lost…in large part. In re Zurn Pex Plumbing Prods. Liab. Litig., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47636, 1 (D. Minn. June[…]

Follow the Court Order: If You are Ordered to Produce Searchable PDF’s, Don’t Produce TIFFs without Searchable Text

June 12, 2009 Josh Gilliland Deposition, Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Form of Production, Motion to Compel, Request for Production, TIFF

Gamesmanship is the harbinger of bad lawyer reputations. Not obeying Court orders can be the death warrant on how the judge will view you every time you appear in her courtroom. One can imagine how things will go for a party when this is the opening line of an opinion:[…]

Discovery is Not a Video Game: There are No Cheat Codes around Discovery Deadlines

June 3, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, ethics, Request for Production

Hochstein v. Microsoft Corp., involves litigation over the Xbox video game system. The Court issued an Order for discovery to close on October 31, 2008. Hochstein v. Microsoft Corp., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44879, 3 (E.D. Mich. May 21, 2009). This obviously required production of any documents or ESI the[…]

What Litigation Hold? Failing to Image Hard Drives and Other Discovery Mistakes

May 27, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Imaging Hard Drives, Litigation Hold, Request for Production, Spoliation

Plunk v. Vill. of Elwood, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42952 (N.D. Ill. May 20, 2009) is a civil rights case with a summer time trial date against a local government, village officials and the police department. The Plaintiffs took the Defendants to task for failing to image six hard drives[…]

Procrastination and Objecting to the Form of Production Don’t Mix

May 22, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Form of Production, Metadata, Motion to Compel, Request for Production, TIFF

It is beyond cavil that this entire problem could have been avoided had there been an explicit agreement between the parties as to production, but as that ship has sailed, it is without question unduly burdensome to a party months after production to require that party to reconstitute their entire[…]

Is ONE Keyword Adequate for a Search?

May 21, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Motion to Compel, Request for Production, Search Terms

Magistrate Judge Facciola’s Asarco, Inc. v. United States EPA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37182 (D.D.C. Apr. 28, 2009) dealt with a very brief issue: Was one keyword adequate for the search of electronically stored information? Short answer: No In Asarco, the Plaintiff opposed a summary judgment motion and sought leave[…]

Know Your Client’s ESI: You Really Don’t Want a Judge Saying, “This is Unacceptable”

May 1, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Duty of Care, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Litigation Hold, Request for Production

This may surprise a few people: There is another magistrate judge besides Judge Waxse writing ESI opinions in Kansas. Magistrate Judge Donald Bostwick issued an order granting in part and denying in part a motion to compel ESI in Patterson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS[…]