Knotty Issues of eDiscovery
Discovery can be a challenge. It can get really ugly if the parties have not agreed on the scope of a case. The case of Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., involves multiple discovery disputes in a case involving allegations of consumer fraud and breach of contract. The[…]
Read more
Discovery disputes often result in strong judicial rebukes. Then there are the judges who work in a good Star Wars reference in an opinion. This case has both. Judge Richard Jones must have felt he was dealing with a phantom menace of discovery disputes, because most of the issues in[…]
Read moreJudge Paul Cherry wrote a masterful opinion involving an EEOC motion to compel production of agreed upon production formats. The case is an excellent example of the issues very alive over the form of production, understanding technology, educating the Court with expert affidavits, and the value of the meet and[…]
Read moreYou know someone is taking a hit when a judge works in references to Pink Floyd’s “Sorrow” and Simon and Garfunkel’s “Sounds of Silence.” Sound the Division Bell, because there is a Bridge Over Troubled Water. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman did exactly that in Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35225[…]
Read moreYou know someone is taking a hit when a judge works in references to Pink Floyd’s “Sorrow” and Simon and Garfunkel’s “Sounds of Silence.” Sound the Division Bell, because there is a Bridge Over Troubled Water. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman did exactly that in Procaps S.A. v. Patheon Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35225[…]
Read moreJudge William Orrick summed up a basic truth of eDiscovery: In the age of electronically-stored information (“ESI”), production of all relevant, not privileged and reasonably accessible documents in a company’s custody and control is easier said than done. Banas v. Volcano Corp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144139, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Oct.[…]
Read moreThere are attorneys who believe the most effective Rule 26(f) meet and confer is simply meeting at dawn with dueling pistols. The parties in Procongps, Inc. v. Skypatrol, LLC, fought over proclaimed inadequate productions, failures to adequately meet and confer and the defensibility of their productions. Procongps, Inc. v. Skypatrol,[…]
Read more
Judge Facciola stands as one of the single most prolific Federal Magistrate Judges in the United States. Once again, the bow tie wearing jurist eloquently laid down the law in Tadayon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. The discovery order concluded with the following passage: III. High Noon As explained at the[…]
Read moreThe Defendants in Specht v. Google, Inc., sought of $21,951.16 for discovery costs. $17,778.64 of that total was for creating digital versions of the discovery. Specht v. Google, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68968, 9-11 (N.D. Ill. June 27, 2011) As a general rule, such costs are taxable if the[…]
Read moreIn a case involving 1st Amendment and RICO allegations by two correctional officers, third-party electronic discovery was sought from different state law enforcement agencies. Couch v. Wan, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68017, at *2 (E.D. Cal. June 23, 2011). The Third-Party sought an order requiring cost-sharing of the electronic discovery. […]
Read more