Knotty Issues of eDiscovery
Shipmates, get ready for a voyage of Electronic Discovery. A cruise line sued their agents for the Defendants’ alleged failure to “provide proper ship management, care and oversight,” for the Plaintiffs’ cruise ships. Seven Seas Cruisesn S. DE R.L. v. V Ships Leisure SAM, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131606 (S.D.[…]
Read moreIn a production dispute over native files, Magistrate Judge Paul Cherry shows us (again) that producing native files as non-searchable PDF’s does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 34. Jannx Med. Sys. v. Methodist Hosps., Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122574 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 17, 2010). Federal Rule[…]
Read moreEveryone got burned in this case, including the Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and especially Rule 1. Brinckerhoff v. Town of Paradise, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126895 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2010). On a positive note, the Court was innovative enough to cited Google Maps in a footnote[…]
Read moreIn a dispute over the creation of Jersey Boys, we see the production of electronically stored information is no musical. Corbello v. Devito, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125207 (D. Nev. Nov. 12, 2010). For the opening act, the Court admonished the attorneys for “their lack of cooperation concerning Electronically Stored Information[…]
Read moreIn a business dispute, the Plaintiffs sought the production of email messages in native file format with metadata. The successor counsel to the Defendant claimed producing as TIFF’s would be sufficient, because the ESI was “no longer available in native format.” Moreover, the Defendant claimed producing metadata was “unnecessary and[…]
Read moreThe Defendants in Johnson v. Neiman sought an order to not produce email messages located on back-up tapes on the basis the electronically stored information was not reasonably accessible. The Court agreed and issued a protective order. Johnson v. Neiman, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110496 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 18, 2010).[…]
Read moreThe Defendants in Romero v. Allstate Ins. Co., opposed a motion to compel to confer with the Plaintiffs over search terms. Romero is an employment class action against Allstate involving alleged coercion to convert employees into independent contractors without their original benefits. Romero v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist.[…]
Read moreThe Court in Radian Asset Assur., Inc. v. College of the Christian Bros. of N.M., wrestled with the issue of compelling the return of an imaged hard drive that had been produced in discovery in a lawsuit with a stipulated protective order. The Court required the hard drive returned and any[…]
Read moreIn a racial profiling case, the parties were in gridlock over custodians and date ranges to search of the electronically stored information. Barrera v. Boughton, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103491 (D. Conn. 2010). After a meet and confer, the Plaintiffs proposed searching 40 custodians, with 80 key words from January 2004[…]
Read moreThe Plaintiffs in 1524948 Alberta Ltd. v. John Doe 1-50 claimed they were the victims of trademark infringement, trade libel, defamation and intentional interference with contractual relationships. The Plaintiffs claimed the unknown Defendants used a website “to publish allegedly “false, defamatory and infringing statements and to conduct other unlawful activity[…]
Read more