Knotty Issues of eDiscovery
News Am. Mktg. In-Store Servs., is a breach of contract case involving multiple eDiscovery disputes. According to the Plaintiff, the Defendant did the following: Destroyed relevant email evidence, including an email server; Failed to produce responsive documents in discovery due to the above failure; and Failed to run appropriate ESI searches[…]
Read moreA Plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus after a trial court ordered the production of the Plaintiff’s personal computer and email accounts. The Court of Appeals of Texas granted the writ. In re Jordan, 364 S.W.3d 425 (Tex. App. Dallas 2012). The case involved claims of a sexually hostile work[…]
Read moreIn a case involving claims of copyright infringement of fabric design, the tapestry of the Plaintiff’s discovery production was challenged, including allegations the Plaintiff: Neglected to search for and produce several categories of documents; and Deleted relevant emails. The Defendants sought an order permitting a forensic examination of Plaintiff’s computer[…]
Read moreI attended the iConect User Conference in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida last month. I have been a guest lecturer for several iConect webinars and it was great to meet many from the team in person. The Conference was content driven, with a keynote by Chris Dale of the e-Disclosure Information Project.[…]
Read moreWhen you think of Tom Wolfe’s “The Right Stuff,” test pilots and astronauts immediately come to mind. Aviators who risked their lives testing new technology that went higher and faster than anything else that could fly. The pilots who flew the X planes of the 1940s to 1960s built the[…]
Read moreThere is no psychic privilege. However, the legal tealeaves foretell a discovery dispute between online psychic advice and the Stored Communication Act. Judge Frank Maas had to interpret the legal Tarot Cards in an employment dispute involving a Plaintiff who sought online psychic advice. The Defendants sought discovery from the[…]
Read morePlaintiffs unsuccessful in a trial involving hostile work environment allegations, argued they were entitled to a new trial, because the trial court did not issue a adverse inference instruction for alleged destroyed ESI. Kullman v. New York, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47649, 3-5 (N.D.N.Y Apr. 4, 2012). The Court agreed[…]
Read moreJudge David Waxse waded into a case that highlighted issues in parties not cooperating and possible inadequate preservation, search and production of ESI. Chura v. Delmar Gardens of Lenexa, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36893, 7-8 (D. Kan. Mar. 20, 2012). The litigation involved an employment dispute with claims of[…]
Read moreThe recording of the iConect webinar “Let’s Review: Increasing Effectiveness of eDiscovery Review” is available to watch on demand at the following link: Let’s Review. The password is Review. The webinar was sponsored and hosted by iConect, on March 15, 2012. Let’s Review focuses on how to maximize technology on[…]
Read moreDetermining search terms can sink into a voyage on the Pequod hunting a white whale. If a party obsesses over search terms, they may find themselves quoting Captain Ahab as they sink in an over-inclusive ocean of electronically stored information. To The Last, I Grapple With Thee In EEOC v.[…]
Read more