Discovery – Page 5 – Bow Tie Law

If It is Lost, It’s Not in Your Possession, Custody or Control under Rule 26(a)

October 30, 2009 Josh Gilliland Deposition, Discovery, Exclusion of Evidence, Initial Disclosures

In a prison medical treatment case, the Plaintiff brought a motion to exclude medical records pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37(c) after the files were not identified in the Defendants’ initial disclosures or produced in discovery. Nance v. Wayne County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96279 (M.D. Tenn.[…]

Things to Think About for Your Rule 26(f) Meeting…

October 22, 2009 Josh Gilliland California Electronic Discovery Act, Criminal Procedure, Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI

In a case management hearing, the parties were directed to consider the following electronically stored information (ESI) issues at their Rule 26(f) conference for drafting their proposed Rule 16(b) order: With regard to any discoverable electronically stored information (ESI) the parties may have, the Court further requests that the joint discovery plan also[…]

Speedy Delivery: Compelling Imaging & Searching of Everything

October 15, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Email, ESI, Imaging Hard Drives, Request for Production, Search Terms

In a contract dispute regarding a shipping vendor, the Plaintiff brought a motion to compel the collection and processing of the entire contents of Defendants’ hard drives, network drives, and user files. Unishippers Global Logistics, LLC v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94844 (D. Utah Oct. 12,[…]

The Titan Killer: Mandatory Exclusion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37(c)(1)

October 6, 2009 Josh Gilliland Deposition, Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Exclusion of Evidence, Initial Disclosures, Supplemental Disclosures

Oracle and SAP are at war. They have exchanged bayonet charges in discovery for two years in a case where Oracle has accused SAP (TomorrowNow) of “systematic and pervasive illegal downloading of Oracle software over approximately six years.” Oracle United States v. Sap Ag, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91432 (N.D.[…]

Auto-Exclusion: Undermining Your Own Case with Failed Disclosures

October 1, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Exclusion of Evidence, Initial Disclosures

Discovery Rules with Teeth Here is a great rule with teeth: If you do not disclose ESI or documents under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a), they are automatically excluded under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37(c)(1). In Melczer v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2009 U.S.[…]

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26 Discussion

September 14, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information

In depth discussion on discovery obligations from my new seminar on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rules 26 and 34.

Disturbo se if I Don’t Produce Discovery?

September 11, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Initial Disclosures, Supplemental Disclosures

In Gotlin v. Lederman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78818 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2009), the Plaintiff was precluded from using Italian medical records because of a failure to include the records in their initial disclosures. In the words of the Court, the Plaintiff’s attorney “provided virtually no discovery during the[…]

101 Bow Ties

September 3, 2009 Josh Gilliland Blogging, Discovery, Document Review, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI

My 101st post is different than any of my other postings to date: Here is the story behind the Bow Tie Law Blog and my thoughts on the practice of law. I have an amazing career. While I was at CT Summation, I traveled to Alaska, across Canada, met with[…]

Don’t Bank on this Strategy to Compel Electronically Stored Information

August 27, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Meet & Confer, Motion to Compel

The Court finds the parties could have avoided the expenses of this Motion by conferring appropriately early in the case about ESI. United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LaSalle Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70514 (S.D. Ohio July 24, 2009). Banks really[…]