Josh Gilliland

Get Out the Check Book for Translating ESI into a Reasonably Usable Form in California

August 21, 2009 Josh Gilliland California Electronic Discovery Act, Discovery, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Form of Production, Reasonably Accessible, Reasonably Useable Form

California Code of Civil Procedure 2031.280(e) states, in relevant part: If necessary, the responding party at the reasonable expense of the demanding party shall, through detection devices, translate any data compilations included in the demand into reasonably usable form. California Code of Civil Procedure 2031.280(e) might give anyone used to[…]

Don’t Argue Imaginary ESI Production Problems

August 19, 2009 Josh Gilliland Document Review, e-Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, ethics, Form of Production, Metadata, Motion to Compel, Native File, OCR, TIFF

In re NetBank, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69031 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 7, 2009) has form of production arguments that illustrate the need to understand the processing abilities of electronically stored information applications and review in litigation support software. The Request for Production In this class certification case, the Plaintiff[…]

Rock Opera Discovery of Archived ESI

August 17, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Form of Production, Meet & Confer, Reasonably Accessible, Request for Production

In re In re Operadora DB Mex., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68078 (M.D. Fla. May 28, 2009), is the story of an international legal dispute, arbitration and the Hard Rock Café. While all of that makes for an exciting feature act, we will rock out to the electronic discovery issues. The[…]

The Holding Pattern: Lessons Learned on Litigation Holds

August 12, 2009 Josh Gilliland Litigation Hold, Spoliation

The past three years have seen an increase of cases highlighting litigation holds and the duty to preserve electronically stored information. There is no shortage of cases that hold many “lessons learned” for attorneys and their clients. The Nightmare Litigation Hold Letter The Napster litigation gave us more then copyright[…]

An Interesting Order…No Twitter in Court

August 11, 2009 Josh Gilliland Blogging, Twitter

Cameras in Courtrooms have been the cannon fodder for courtroom sketches for years. A recent court order for a trial in Florida highlights how judges are keenly aware of technology and reporters. A temporary press room was set up for reporters covering a criminal trial. The reporters would be allowed to[…]

Attorney Client Text Messages or Texting & Depositions Don’t Mix

August 10, 2009 Josh Gilliland Attorney Client Privilege, Discovery, ethics, Text Messages

A child was injured at an Old Navy store (a subsidiary of the Gap) on a clothing rack, and naturally, a lawsuit followed in Federal Court based on Diversity Jurisdiction. Wei Ngai v. Old Navy, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67117 (D.N.J. July 31, 2009). The Plaintiffs deposed the Gap’s General[…]

The Missing Link: A Duty to Preservation Imbedded Images & Hyperlinks?

August 7, 2009 Josh Gilliland Duty to Preserve, Electronically Stored Information, ESI, Spoliation

Paleontologists have searched for the missing link, the remains of an transitional life form, showing a state of evolution. Lawyers today continue the quest for missing links, but not for transitional life forms, but inactive hyperlinks to websites. The Plaintiff in Ferron v. Echostar Satellite, LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66637 (S.D.[…]

Private Eyes, and the California Supreme Court, are Watching You!

August 5, 2009 Josh Gilliland Reasonable Expectation of Privacy

The California Supreme Court, probably counting down until they have to decide cases regarding the new Electronic Discovery Act, weighed in with a case that will make people shake their heads and feel uncomfortable. The Defendants ran a non-profit residential facility for neglected and abused children. The Plaintiffs worked for[…]

Invasion of Privacy and Spoliation on MySpace

August 3, 2009 Josh Gilliland Defamation, Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Social Networking, Spoliation

It is true that mass communication is no longer limited to a tiny handful of commercial purveyors and that we live with much greater access to information than the era in which the tort of invasion of privacy developed. A town crier could reach dozens, a handbill hundreds, a newspaper[…]

Turning Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures into Rule 26(e) Supplemental Disclosures

July 31, 2009 Josh Gilliland Discovery, Initial Disclosures, Request for Production, Supplemental Disclosures

What happens if more responsive documents are found after the case management order setting a required disclosure deadline? Answer: You must supplement your disclosure. In Kutrip v. City of St. Louis, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60199 (E.D. Mo. June 30, 2009), the deadline for discovery was November 30, 2006 and[…]