Knotty Issues of eDiscovery
Plaintiffs requested email sent to or from the Defendants on November 4, 2011 in their April 10, 2012 discovery requests. The Plaintiffs had filed the lawsuit and an emergency preliminary injunction on November 7, 2011, which was attended by Defense counsel. The Defendants claimed producing the emails was impossible, because[…]
Read moreThe New York Court of Appeals denied Nonparty Twitter, Inc.’s appeal in People v Harris as “academic” and moot, because the Tweets in question had been produced pursuant to the State’s subpoenas. New York v. Harris, 2013 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2039 (N.Y. Misc. 2013). The case involved the prosecution of an[…]
Read moreThere are attorneys who believe the most effective Rule 26(f) meet and confer is simply meeting at dawn with dueling pistols. The parties in Procongps, Inc. v. Skypatrol, LLC, fought over proclaimed inadequate productions, failures to adequately meet and confer and the defensibility of their productions. Procongps, Inc. v. Skypatrol,[…]
Read moreW Holding Co. v. Chartis Ins. Co., is a case involving competing proposed discovery protocols. The parties include the FDIC as the receiver of a bank and the former bank directors & officers in a $176 million suit with claims of negligence in making loans. W Holding Co. v. Chartis[…]
Read moreHow do you know there is a duty to preserve? When two managing officers involved in the termination of an employee are repeatedly asked by an attorney for their electronic calendars, including a letter threatening an EEOC complaint if there was not an amicable resolution, and then followed by formal discovery[…]
Read moreI am gonna to hit the brakes, he’ll fly right by me. Maverick, Top Gun You’re gonna do what? Merlin, Top Gun Attorneys feel compelled by their duty of competency to their clients to have eyes on every document that might be privileged. Given cases such as J-M Manufacturing it[…]
Read moreIn an employment dispute, the Defendant sought access to the Plaintiff’s Facebook profile and personal computer. The case had involved several discovery disputes challenging the Plaintiff’s discovery productions. Potts v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38795, 5-9 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2013). Among the discovery requests, the Defendant requested[…]
Read moreCosts in eDiscovery are a never ending ordeal for parties. There is little question that the Taxation Guidelines should be updated to meet the realities of computer forensic investigation, preservation and processing. Consider the following situation, where the Court addressed “image processing”: Mitre has requested a total of $5,453.96 in[…]
Read moreI was deeply sadden to learn of the passing of Grover Mundell. Grover was always a gentlemen. I enjoyed saying hello to him at the different legal conferences over the years. I am very sorry for his family’s loss. Grover’s memorial service will be held at Temple Emanu-El in Dunwoody, GA[…]
Read moreI had the good fortune to organize a seminar on responding to electronic discovery requests for the Santa Clara County Bar Association’s Civil Practice Committee on February 27, 2013. However, this seminar was different from other eDiscovery CLE’s, because the attendees spent a full hour conducting searches for responsive ESI[…]
Read more